Feldnotizenaus einer vermessenen Bibliothek
Was uns gemessene Videos gelehrt haben
Wir bewerten YouTube-Videos danach, wie viel der Laufzeit tatsächlich liefert. Das sind die Muster, die auftauchten, sobald genug davon zusammenkamen.
Median Füllmaterial 36% Median-Beginn des nützlichen Teils 0:47 neu berechnet 19 Oct 2026
-
Datenbericht15. Okt. 202612 Min.
How much of a YouTube video is actually worth watching? We measured, minute by minute
We scored every minute of a library of learning videos. The median video earns 57% of its runtime, the first and last tenth earn least, and the title predicts a skip.
-
Datenbericht15. Okt. 20268 Min.
The best YouTube channels for learning, by subject: measured video by video (2026)
The top three educational YouTube channels in each of 16 subjects, ranked by the median score of their measured videos, and why even the best channels are not gold every time.
-
Artikel30. Sep. 20265 Min.
Gistil vs Eightify: a verdict before you watch, or a summary instead of watching
Eightify summarizes YouTube videos. Gistil tells you whether one is worth your time, then plays only the useful parts. An honest side-by-side for 2026.
-
Artikel30. Sep. 202610 Min.
The best AI YouTube summarizers in 2026: eleven tools compared
Eleven AI video summarizers and YouTube tools compared on 15 October 2026: what each outputs, which tell you if a video is worth watching, prices, and accuracy.
-
Artikel4. Sep. 20266 Min.
How to Know If a YouTube Video Is Worth Watching Before You Watch It
Learn how to decide whether a YouTube video is worth watching before you spend 20, 45, or 90 minutes on it.
-
Artikel4. Sep. 20269 Min.
How to Learn From YouTube: Study With Videos Worth Your Time
How to learn from YouTube without passive watching: pick videos worth your time, start at the useful part, and turn watching into progress toward a goal.
-
Artikel4. Sep. 20266 Min.
How to Stop Wasting Time on YouTube and Watch Videos More Efficiently
Stop wasting time on YouTube with a simple system for choosing better videos, avoiding recommendation loops, finding key ideas faster, and watching more efficiently.
-
Artikel1. Sep. 20265 Min.
Why a summary of a long video reads so well and helps so little
A summary is a compression, and the things it loses are the things that made the video worth watching. Four failure modes, and the one job summaries are genuinely good at.
-
Artikel1. Sep. 20265 Min.
What Gistil shows you on a YouTube page, and why each part is there
A verdict, three numbers, and the receipts behind them — shown next to the video before you press play. Here is every part of the panel and what it is claiming.
-
Artikel1. Sep. 20265 Min.
A tutorial from three years ago may not work any more. How to check before you start
Six minutes into a tutorial the button it names is gone. Here is how to tell which old tutorials are safe, which are not, and why the date is the wrong thing to check first.
-
Datenbericht1. Sep. 20266 Min.
The eight-minute pile-up: where runtimes cluster, and what it costs
Runtimes pile up the moment a video passes eight minutes. The pile is real and easy to see. The penalty everyone assumes comes with it is not.
-
Datenbericht1. Sep. 20266 Min.
Sponsor reads take 1.6% of the runtime. Padding takes 40%.
One in five measured videos carries a sponsor read, and it runs about sixty-seven seconds. The thing that actually spends your time is somewhere else entirely.